Sl No |
Q/A |
FAQ-7 : Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act |
1 |
Question |
What is Section 65B of Indian
Evidence Act? |
|
Answer |
Section 65B was introduced in the Indian Evidence Act
1872 when ITA 2000 was enacted. It defines the method in which an
electronic document needs to be certified if it has to be admissible in
a Court of Law as evidence. |
2 |
Question |
Is Section 65B Certificate
mandatory? |
|
Answer |
Yes. This has been mandatory since 17th October 2000 when ITA 2000 was
notified. |
3 |
Question |
Why Section 65B certification is required? |
|
Answer |
An electronic document is a "Binary Document". It can
never be produced in tangible form to the Court. It is always held in a
"container" such as a CD or hard disk and can be "Experienced" by a human
being only by interpreting the binary code through a hardware, software
system. The Judge when he views or hears or sees an electronic document is
seeing it through the eyes of the hardware-software and not directly. Hence
it is necessary for some other human being to present the electronic
document to the Court with a certification that "This is what I saw or heard
or seen". |
4 |
Question |
What is the format of the Certificate? |
|
Answer |
Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act lays down the format in which the
Certificate is to be produced. See www.ceac.in
for more details. |
5 |
Question |
What is CEAC? |
|
Answer |
CEAC stands for "Cyber Evidence Archival Center" and it
is a service run under the guidance of Naavi since around 2002 to provide
Section 65B certificates for Electronic Documents. "CEAC Certification" is
synonymous with "Section 65B Certification". |
6 |
Question |
Is CEAC certificate accepted in Courts? |
|
Answer |
CEAC/Naavi was the first entity to submit a Section 65B
certificate to a Court in India in the case of State of Tamil Nadu Vs Suhas
Katti. It was admitted and the accused was convicted on the basis of the
evidence. At that time a point of objection was raised by the defence if
Naavi who is not a Government appointed "Expert" can provide such
certificate. The Court stated that there is no requirement that only a
Government agency need to submit the certificate. Being only a "Matter of
Fact" certification, it is considered that any trusted third party can
produce such a certificate. |
7 |
Question |
Can Section 65B Certificate be challenged? |
|
Answer |
Yes. Once admitted, it is the prerogative of the defence
to challenge any evidence. However, when the certificate is submitted by a
trusted third party and cannot be challenged as "Self Serving", the Court
may be reluctant to accept the challenge easily. If accepted, the Court may
invite a Digital Forensic Examiner accredited under Section 79A of ITA 2008
to assist the Court in satisfying itself about the genuineness of the
document. Defence can submit its own Forensic challenge if any. |
8 |
Question |
Is it necessary for the Section 65B Certifier to personally depose? |
|
Answer |
No. The Section 65B certificate can be produced by the litigant along with
his affidavit for presenting any evidence. However, the defense may ask for
personal examination of the certifier and the Court at its discretion may
accept or reject such demand. |
9 |
Question |
In the Past electronic evidence has been accepted without Section 65B
Certification. Will they be rejected? |
|
Answer |
If the case is in trial stage, there is a possibility that the Court may ask
for reproduction of electronic evidence with certification. If the case has
already been closed, Court may not re-open the judgment solely on this
ground. (Refer www.ceac.in for more
details) |